Search Beyond Hogwarts:
The Repeating History of Dumbledore
by David Haber
When we first meet young Tom Riddle in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, I believe J.K. Rowling is wording descriptions of events with it in mind for us to see similarities between Tom Riddle and Harry. But now that we know the end of the story, and now that we know more about Dumbledore himself, I have lately been thinking more about similarities between Tom Riddle and Gellert Grindelwald.
> Read the full article
Pages: << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>
well i simply think that dumbledore liked Grindlewald and for instance, voldemort, is because of his perception of seeing good in people. always good. in half blood prince, in second chapter, snape told bellatrix that how he was able to get in dumbledore's goodbooks by telling a story of greatest remorse and dumbledore welcomes him with open arms. he also says that dumbledore likes the best of every person. so i think dumbledore was simply attracted to both dark waizards because of their abilities and brilliance.
Posted by hassan from pakistan on November 26, 2007 02:03 AM
Again, a great article with new points of view...
I have never seen the similarities you point out in the relationships Dumbledore - Grindelwald and Dumbledore - Riddle. I think it shows us that Dumbledore deeply believes in the good nature of men (wizards), for he tries to change and educate rather than give up hope from the start. Maybe Dumbledore helped Voldemort to power by giving him access to education and useful networks, but he also gave him a chance.
It corresponds with what he once told Harry (something like "not our abilities matter, but what we use them for"). Tom Riddle was given a chance, but he himself chose the way.
Posted by Monika on November 26, 2007 02:40 AM
I think Dumbledore made the same mistake with Voldemort as he did with Grindlewald but he did it because he believed in people, that they could change and he believed in the best in every people, it was not, in my opinion, because he was attracted to them. I think we are just exaggerating it.
Posted by potter fan on November 26, 2007 06:48 AM
i don't believe that dumbledore made the same mistakes with riddle as he did with grindlewald. the reasons for this are things that dumbledore and riddle say to harry.
1) in HBP dumbledore tells harry that riddle never tried to charm like he did the other teachers so dumbledore wouldn't be able to get close to riddle as he did with grindlewald
2) riddle himself says in CoS that dumbledore never seemed to like or trust him as much as the other teachers did
both of these statements i believe show a very distanced relationship between riddle and dumbledore (similar to snape and harry, although very different in many ways)
i believe that even if dumbledore would have wanted to change riddle he would have found it extremely difficult because of riddle's apparent caution around him.
Posted by carl from birmingham, england on November 26, 2007 2:22 PM
Great article Dave! A Man sees what he wants to see, so did harry and so did we when we were first reading that letter from Dumbledore to Grindelwald as you rightly said "plotting things" but you have brought them in a new light and that really seems the case. It is exacly the case of being modest in critisizing our loved ones action when we try to change their behaviour.
Dumbledore in no way responsible for terribleness of Riddle. He believed in giving choices and well, Tom Riddle was given the choice and he used it badly, what's dumbledore's fault in this? And has not 'our' experience with time traveling had taught us any thing? You can not predict the future. Results of man's action are so complex that is very difficult to say what
happen. Dumbledore did a routine thing I guess when he sponsored Riddle (why else a fund'll be there just for Riddle?) It was lucky that dumbledore went to see Riddle, otherwise he would never had got those rare insights into Riddle's mind (Tom riddle was regretful of revealing about himself to Dumbledore in his first meeting. Could Dumbledore (or Dippet, as he was the then headmaster) deny entry to Riddle to Hogwarts just because he was bullish or was a parcelmouth? Dumbledore was not attracted to Riddle as he has learnt from his past mistake (which is a great thing, many can't do it). He was just being watchful of him because he must have seen a shadow of Grindelwald in Riddlem otherwise why was he keeping tracking his movements, and surely it proved to be for greater good later.
Posted by swati from india on November 26, 2007 9:47 PM
I dont know why, but since the time JKR has announced abt Dumbledore, everyone is analysing his each and every activity, everything he said in a negative way.
Posted by Potter Fan on November 27, 2007 05:24 AM
It seems to me that Hogwarts and the wizarding world are on the honor system. How much control did the teachers exert over any student? The students who were inclined to follow the rules did so, and the others received detentions. There was plenty of misbehavior, rule-breaking and sneaking around by Harry, Draco, Riddle, Hagrid (as a student) and others with little consequence. The only student we know of who got expelled was Hagrid, thanks to Riddle. And as for the Ministry's authority, Voldemort took care of that by infiltrating it with
Rather than scaring Riddle, I think Dumbledore unwittingly gave him the clues he used to undermine "the controls" other wizards accept as part of civilised society, when they spoke in the orphanage. Once again, Dumbledore saw the best in everyone, including Riddle, and even though he had his suspicions, he was blinded by his own goodness, his trust in others. I can't believe there was a sexual attraction on the part of Dumbledore toward Riddle, an 11 year old boy. That is just disturbing.
Dave, I disagree that sexual attraction is part of all our human relationships. I would never let my children out of my sight, at school, at birthday parties or anywhere, if I accepted your assumption that a trusted headmaster of advanced age might "take an interest" in my 11 year old son. Yes, I know it happens, tragically, but it is deviant, not accepted. And I wonder if that secretary in your example knew she would interview as a woman, and yet become a girl once she had the job?
Posted by Patty from Quincy,Massachusetts on November 27, 2007 08:01 AM
No, Dave, it IS well possible to find someone attractive and handsome without having the remotest sexual interest in that person. I think you are going too far here, assuming that just because Dumbledore is
he has to be attracted to every male he encounters! Yes, there are certain similarities between Grindelwald and Riddle, but these probably have put Dumbledore even more on the lookout.
Harry too noticed that Tom Riddle was a handsome person in HBP when he and Dumbledore watch Hokey's memory through the pensieve, and Harry is definately not
! Again: noticing a person's looks is just that: noticing a person's looks!
Dumbledore is a wise, experienced and professional teacher, and, as pointed out before, he was concerned about the kind of behaviour Riddle showed in the orphanage and watched him ever since. He also wanted to give Riddle his chance,something every teacher would have done as Riddle was only eleven!
I was really happy when Rowling pronounced Dumbledore
but I can now see what this really (and most unfortunately) did: it causes people to see all his actions from a sexual point of view, which is an insult to Dumbledore's professionalism!
Posted by Siena from Leeds, UK on November 27, 2007 10:13 AM
Patty and Siena: You are confusing thoughts with actions. I'm sure both of you see people of the opposite sex on the street and think they are attractive. You do it with people you see on TV and in the movies all the time. You pay to watch specific movies because they include people who especially are attractive to you. That's all I'm talking about. It doesn't have anything to do with acting on it in any way. We make friends with someone for many reasons, after you get to know them, you find out what you have in common, etc. But upon first look, a physical attraction can be the spark that gets you together, then you become friends on the other levels later.
And that's all I'm saying with Dumbledore and Grindelwald. We know Dumbledore was
and we know Grindelwald was a good looking boy. An initial physical attraction draws Dumbledore to Grindelwald, then they meet on other levels (same age, magical brilliance...) The point of the article was that he could have felt the same thing for Tom Riddle. An attraction. Nothing more.
Initial physical attraction for people is a fact of life. That's what I was talking about in the article, not one person wanting to physically have sexual contact with another.
Posted by Dave Haber from Los Angeles, CA on November 27, 2007 10:14 AM
I don't see why the writer of this article finds it hard to believe that Dumbledore HAD sexual relations with Grindlewald.
It is widely known that Grindlewald like Dumbledore, had NO close/sexual female relationships. What would be wrong or hard for two men (with no known female relations) to hook up and engage in
Come On people. Rita Skeeter told us that Bathilda Bagshot thought "the two boys immediately took a liking to each other." This was mutual attraction on both sides, unlike the writer of this article who seems to think that this attraction was on Dumbledore's part only.
If the "attraction" was only on Dumbledore's part, Why in the world was Grindlewald "afraid" of Dumbledore? I know some p'ple might say it's because of the whole Ariana/Aberforth issue but I think not. Grindlewald had already proved that
ing people's relatives does NOT make him "fear" their loved-ones' vengeancy.
Grindlewald was only afraid of Dumbledore out of the many people whose loved ones he
ed or hurt because he once loved him. Grindlewald was never in my mind to turn out like Tom Riddle because unlike Tom, Grindlewald was capable of loving. That is why he felt remorse for what he had done alone in his cell in Numengard.
My conclusion is that Grindlewald and Dumbledore were boyfriends and apart from discussions all day, they engaged in sexual activities together.
Their refusal to talk or comment about each other after their separation is a sign of how much secretive things were between them. We all know Dumbledore is secretive but what reason does Grindlewald have to be secretive about his encounter with young Dumbledore? Grindlewald even boosted about his acquisition of a power wand! The families of his victims were never in his mind. If not for a one time LOVE, why would he be afraid of a relative (Dumbledore) of his victim (Ariana)?
People are acting like Dumbledore had no sexual desires. Like somehow he was not human/wizard. There is a fine distinction between a God and a Wizard. Let us not cross him over to a God-like figure.
Yes, he was capable of sexual activities with people/men just as he was capable of loving them. I remember him telling Harry that he was no different from other people.
Posted by Rehema from Richmond, VA USA on November 27, 2007 3:12 PM
"Dumbledore did a routine thing I guess when he sponsored Riddle (why else a fund'll be there just for Riddle?)"
My understanding was that there was actually a fund for children like Tom. Orphans from a muggle background who otherwise would never have understood their magical power properly and who might otherwise have become a danger to themselves and others through the uncontrolled and unknowing use of magic. It would put the Secrecy Act in danger of being breached. (Of course Voldemort's solution to this was simply to shove them in Azkaban!) Dumbledore in going to Tom was probably acting under instructions from the school.
Voldemort's entire characterisation come across as psychopathic. In the clinical sense. So many of the pointers are there in the young Tom Riddle. The subtle bullying, the
ing of a pet rabbit, his vision of himself as "special" and set apart from the rest of the herd. Somehow above them and exempt from the rules. He saw people as there to be used and had no use for love unless he could twist it to his own agenda. His obsession with power and control is typical too. Also psychopaths are very, very good at playing a part, disguising their true natures and manipulating those around them. Riddle did all this with his teachers at Hogwarts. Only Dumbledore who had seen a glimpse of the truth remained suspicious. Given all this I very much doubt that anyone had the least chance of turning Riddle from his path. But we have to remember that a diagnosis like that is terribly easy with 20/20 hindsight. No one could have predicted what Riddle would become.
Posted by Elizabeth from Australia on November 27, 2007 3:42 PM
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: If J.K. didn't put it in the book, we can't cite it. As such, I think any speculation as to Dumbledore's relationship status with Grindewald as being anything other than what J.K. directly tells us (in the books, not extracurricular interviews) can't be the basis for a sound argument. The series is over and unless Jo publishes second editions, anything she says about characters or events are irrelivant. I frankly find it irresponsible of her to spend the time she does crafting fine stories only to start throwing more information out just too keep herself in the spot light and not surrender the world of Harry Potter -- It belongs to the fans and time now; when future generations read these stories, they
have the text and the text only to depend upon for interpretation, which is as it should be.
That being said, Dave, some thought provoking issues. However, we can play the 'what if' game all day (and be pretty entertained by the process as well). Dumbledore always said that people are alone accountable for their actions and that prophocies and fate and foreshadowing only come to fruition as people make choices, i.e. the prophacy, so I don't believe that we can dish all of that responsibilty on to Dumbledore, if we do (and I know I do) believe that we are masters of our own destany.
Posted by Tim from Flagstaff, AZ on November 27, 2007 4:09 PM
Pages: << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>